Mess with baby = big marketing faux pas
Marketing ethics 101: don’t lie to people
According to Yonhap news, Consumers Korea, a consumer advocacy group, released a report showing that several international and local Korean baby skin care product manufacturers are marketing products containing potentially harmful chemical preservatives and fragrances as ‘natural’ or even ‘organic’.
Seven of nine products labeled ‘organic,’ tested positive for potentially harmful chemicals including parabens, benzyl alcohol, PEG, and unqualified ‘fragrance.’
Working as a consumer products marketer I became familiar with just how difficult it is to create ‘natural’ products that perform decently in the market. Most of the additives mentioned by Consumers Korea serve a particular function. Without them product quality would suffer.
In order to make product smell better, smoother, more viscous, less viscous, etc. the R&D guys insist you’ve got to keep the additives. It’s either that or kiss the product’s quality controllability/ acceptable expiration period/ temperature resistance/freight strain certification goodbye.
But your job is to sell. The market demands organic. Your competitors have removed all parabens and other chemical additives from their entire line – and pulled fragrance to boot.
“And you can bet they smell like dog shit and will rot if they’re not refrigerated too,” is the official response from R&D to your upbeat ‘if they can do it, we can do it better!’ market assessment memo.
So you’re forced to re-group. “Is there anything we can do to be more natural?” And this is where you begin to fuck up.
Just because you throw in a few ‘natural ingredients’ or even a single organic one, if the overall product formula contains parabens, unqualified ‘fragrance,’ PEG, or benzyl alcohol, you best not be claiming ‘natural,‘ let alone ‘organic’ on your product labels, or you are going to incur the wrath of some very belligerent consumers – namely baby mothers.
Granted, none of these ingredients are banned, or have even, quite frankly, been scientifically proven harmful beyond a shadow of doubt. But that is not the point.
These marketers went wrong when they failed to deliver on expectations. And while their copy tricks probably seemed clever at the time, real marketing is about the end game. Real marketing is about the long-term relationship a marketer forms with the customer. If you’re tricking your consumer with your messaging, and they figure it out – and they will fingure it out, that copy is going to self-destruct. And it might take the brand down with it. Bottom line is, you had better be able to deliver on your value proposition.
Although I’m not going to list all the offenders, Boryung Mediance (보령메디앙스) deserves a dis-honorable mention for ‘Nuk Natural Diaper Cream.’ One would think that after the big asbestos-powder fiasco the company would at least make an effort at minding its PR p’s and q’s. But then again, I’m probably expecting too much from a company that came up with “Nuk” for a baby product line. On the other hand, with a name like that, maybe excessive harmful chemicals are totally in line with brand values?? Who am I to judge??
